Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label truth. Show all posts

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Eureka! Springs and More

HOPE S.H.A.R.E.D. (Share How Abba Relates Every Day)



Palace Bath House, Eureka Springs, Arkansas

My husband and I enjoyed a quick getaway to Eureka Springs, Arkansas while two daughters went to church camp and the third got spoiled by grandparents.
The first afternoon, we caught the trolley downtown, shopped the quaint stores, hiked paths not on the map,  marveled at a historical "haunted" hotel, caught a $10 limosuine with a mock fireplace inside back to our bed and breakfast, ate chicken fried streak and the works, and finally, exhausted, watched the Oklahoma City Thunder win.
The next day, we hiked to see local "must sees", ate tasty catfish, went to an exotic cat rescue center, ate an awesome prime rib dinner, walked around the Great Passion Play campus (play not scheduled on Sunday), and relaxed.  I would recommend Eureka Springs if you live anywhere nearby. (Next time we will watch the Great Passion Play).
The history of Eureka Springs intrigued me.  Before 1850, only Indian legends spoke of the "magical waters" of Eureka Springs.  In 1856, Dr. Alvah Jackson,  the first white settler to "discover" the healing springs, used the healing waters to cure his son of an eye ailment.  The waters were later used at "Dr. Jackson's Cave Hospital" for combatants during the Civil War.  After the war, Dr. Jackson sold "Dr. Jackson's Eye Water" for a profit.
In 1879, word about the water spread quickly after the doctor's friend and hunting companion, Judge J.B. Saunders, was cured of a crippling disease at Basin Spring.  Mr. Saunders promoted the springs with his considerable influence.  People flocked to the area in search of water.  The word "eureka" means "I found it!".   By the end of 1879, an estimated 10,000 people had found the water and moved into the area.  Only two years later, Eureka Springs was the fourth largest city in Arkansas, all because of water.

This account reminded me of a story in the Bible, where sick people flocked to the water of the pool of Bethesda in Jerusalem.  The story, found in John 5, tells about a man sick for thirty-eight years, waiting among the crowd at the pool for his turn to get into the healing waters.  
John 5:6 says, When Jesus saw the sick man, He knew he had been ill for a long time.  He asked him, “Would you like to get well?”

John 5:7 reads, “I can’t, sir,” the sick man said, “for I have no one to put me into the pool when the water bubbles up. Someone else always gets there ahead of me.” (John 5:4 explains that when an angel stirred the waters, only the first one to enter would be healed). 

Can you imagine lying on the side of the pool, waiting and waiting.  When the time comes to get in, you struggle to get on your hands and knees to crawl into the pool.  You're almost there, when someone walking steps in before you.  Disappointed.  Rejected again.  No hope.  You return to waiting.  

Jesus told the sick man, "Get up.  Pick up your pallet and walk."  Verses 9-10 say, "Instantly, the man was healed! He rolled up his sleeping mat and began walking! But this miracle happened on the Sabbath, 10 so the Jewish leaders objected. They said to the man who was cured, “You can’t work on the Sabbath! The law doesn’t allow you to carry that sleeping mat!” (The Jews had many unwritten rules regarding work on the Sabbath.  One of the rules considered carrying your  mat as work, which would break the law of the Sabbath).

Can you imagine, finally healed after thirty-eight years of sickness?  You stand amazed.  Yet more astonishing, people around you are not rejoicing, but pointing a finger at you that you broke a rule!
John 5:11-18 says, "But he replied, “The man who healed me told me, ‘Pick up your mat and walk.'"12 “Who said such a thing as that?” they demanded.  13 The man didn’t know, for Jesus had disappeared into the crowd. 14 But afterward Jesus found him in the Temple and told him, “Now you are well; so stop sinning, or something even worse may happen to you.” 15 Then the man went and told the Jewish leaders that it was Jesus who had healed him.  16 So the Jewish leaders began harassing Jesus for breaking the Sabbath rules. 17 But Jesus replied, “My Father is always working, and so am I.” 18 So the Jewish leaders tried all the harder to find a way to kill him. For he not only broke the Sabbath, he called God his Father, thereby making himself equal with God."

The sick man's eurekas.  He laid helplessly searching for healing water.  In the mean time, he discovered these "I found it" truths about Jesus:

Eureka# 1.  Jesus:  All Knowing
Look back at the bold in John 5:6.  Jesus knew the man had been sick for thirty-eight years.  How?  Because Jesus is God, He is all-knowing.

Eureka # 2.  Jesus:  All Powerful
Jesus healed the man without him using "miracle water".  He healed him with His power, demonstrating His power over sickness.  As God, Jesus is All Powerful!

Eureka # 3. Jesus:  All Loving
This may have been his most life-changing discovery about Jesus.  The man did nothing to deserve Jesus' healing.  His healing had been denied every time he missed the stirred waters, as if he would deserve healing if he was the fastest.  Yet Jesus healed him just the way he was, fast or slow, demonstrating His great love for him. 

Jesus didn't care about the day of his healing, Sabbath.  Look at the bold in John 5:17 that says Jesus is always working to change lives.  Jesus didn't care that this healing on the Sabbath and his words calling himself God (John 5:18), would cause the Jewish leaders to try harder to find a way to kill him.

Jesus expressed his love to heal the man's physical body.  More importantly, he warned the man about sin effecting his spiritual, eternal body (John 5:14).

In John 5:24 Jesus says, “I tell you the truth, those who listen to my message and believe in God who sent me have eternal life. They will never be condemned for their sins, but they have already passed from death into life."

Have you discovered the all knowing, all powerful, all loving Jesus?  f so, are you rejoicing when Jesus changes a life, or pointing a finger like Jewish leaders?  If you know Jesus, are you leaving people waiting for water to stir, or leading them to the spiritual healing source, Jesus?




Linked to:

Bible Love Notes

Friday, March 30, 2012

Truth: Part 3

This is the 3rd and final post about "Truth" (for now).  You may want to read Truth Part 1 and  Truth Part 2 before you read this part.  Truth Part 1 shares, "Truth promotes Logic". Truth Part 2 shares, "Truth promotes Law." And now,  

3)    Truth promotes LORD (had to have a "L" word for God)

 I agree with Nietzsche that we all have different perspectives (way we look at life, opinions).  Perspectives do not guide us to truth.  And, truth exists independent of all perspectives.  Either a person’s perspective is true or false.  An example I used with my daughter: we could both look at my purple cell phone and have different perspectives (opinions) of the color.  I could wrongly say, "It is black," She could disagree saying, "It's purple."  I asked her if the the phone has a true color.  She said, "Yes, it can only have one true color."  I agree with my nine-year-old.  Because the phone exists, it has a TRUE color.  What if we both decided to call the color of my phone, red?  Would that change the TRUE color?  No.  What if we agree on the color, does that mean it is correct?  Not necessarily.  The phone's true color is true because it is true.  True? (my daughter laughed at the last statement)   

Nietzsche denied God’s existence (his perspective).  Can God not exist for Nietzsche and others who deny God, and yet exist for those who do believe in God?  No.  Either God exists or he doesn’t.  Our perspectives do not change the truth.  Because we live in reality, we can believe the truth about who we are as people, who God is, and how we relate to God.

Many Christian philosophers offer several arguments for God's existence.  The editors of the book, "To Everyone an Answer: A Case for the Christian Worldview" include five different arguments:  the kalam cosmological argument, an argument from design, a Thomistic cosmological argument, a moral argument, and an ontological argument* (may simplify these in a future blog post).  Philosopher Paul Copan summarizes the moral argument in his chapter as:  If objective moral values exist, then God exists. Objective moral values do exist.  Therefore, God exists.*  Simply speaking:  "objective" defined as "measurable"; "moral values" defined as "what is right and wrong (true or false)" The moral argument bases this statement on the fact that truth exists.  Moral truth (right or wrong) must exist for objective moral values to exist.  Therefore, truth promotes the moral argument that God exists. 

Wow!  My brain hurts.  
   






*Francis J. Beckwith, William Lane Craig, and J.P. Moreland, To Everyone an Answer: A Case For the Christian Worldview , (Downers Grove, Illinois:IVP Academic, 2004) .


Friday, March 16, 2012

Truth: Part 2

 
I remember the first questions each of my girls asked repeatedly, "what's that, what's that, what's that?" I answered this question with one or two words for them to add to their vocabulary. The next phrase, "why?" wasn't as easy to answer. My simplified answer usually led to another, "why?". After answering about five "whys" in a row, I would usually exasperatedly answer, "That's just the way it is. Or, I don't know. Or, depending on the question, sometimes I used the phrase I heard my parents say and promised I would never use, "because I said so."

When it comes to questions about what I believe about the Bible, God, Jesus, heaven, faith, and other religions, I had easy answers for the “what’s that?” questions the girls asked.  However, when I had no answer for God’s existence when talking to my atheist neighbor a year and a half ago, I knew I needed better answers for the “why?” questions.  I want to defend my faith with truth and not just respond with, “I don’t know.  Or, that’s just the way it is.”  I desire for my girls to know why they believe what they believe and not just, “because my parents told me so.”

1)    Truth promotes LOGIC (see last post; Truth part 1)

2)  Truth promotes LAW






According to Douglas Groothuis, who quotes from Friedrich Nietzsche’s books, The Will to Power and The Portable Nietzsche, Nietzsche’s philosophy of perspectivism has influenced the “no truth” person today.  Nietzsche claimed that facts do not exist, “only interpretations (or constructions) created according to one’s particular needs to enhance one’s life, what he called “the power to will.””  Groothuis quotes Nietzsche, “There is no true world, “only “a perspectival appearance whose origin lies in us.” In other words, we all have different points of view and none of them are actually true.  Reality doesn’t exist. *1
Perspectivism also supports the idea that lying does not exist.   If there is no truth, only a matter of interpretation, the facts in which to deny (lie), do not exist.  Can that be true?  Sounds like the law of non-contradiction again.  Ironically, the biggest problem in our world began with a lie, a lie from the “father of lies”, Satan himself.  Satan lied to Eve, telling her she will not die, like God said, if she ate of the fruit (Genesis 3).  Eve believed Satan and not God.  Choosing disobedience caused sin to enter the perfect world God created.  We will always be tempted to believe Satan’s lies, tell lies ourselves, and believe in the obvious lie, that truth does not exist.*1    
To summarize, if perspectivism is true, (which can’t be by its own definition), there is no reality, no lying, and no need for laws.  Does that sound absurd to you? However, because truth exists and people still lie, we need laws against lying.  Think about it, God included “not lying” in the Ten Commandments, Exodus 20:16 says, “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.”  God knows people don’t you think?  He created us, you know.  And He died for us, "while we were still sinners, Christ died for us." Romans 5:8.
Truth (and lies) promotes the need for law.

Source:*1) Douglas Groothuis, “Facing the Challenge of Postmodernism” in Francis J. Beckwith, William Lane Craig, and J.P. Moreland, To Everyone an Answer: A Case For the Christian Worldview , (Downers Grove, Illinois:IVP Academic, 2004) .



For Truth Part 3


Linked to: Laura (friend of Douglas Groothius)

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Truth Part 1


After completing a certificate from Biola University in Apologetics (defending the faith), I’m finally trying to get thoughts on paper that I can understand and teach my girls.

 Why stand for truth?

1)    Truth promotes LOGIC

When I explained to my girls, ages 10, 9 and 6, the idea that some people don’t believe truth exists, they looked at me as if I’m from another planet.  They’ve learned enough math to understand 1+1=2  is always true.   If they would answer differently on a test, they would get it wrong.  They couldn’t argue, “Well teacher, in my opinion, 1+1 = 3.” Math demands absolute truth. 

However, Douglas Groothuis, in the book To Everyone an Answer: A Case For the Christian Worldview states, “The postmodernist deconstruction of objective truth and rationality amounts to this: truth does not lodge in statements that correspond to reality.  Truth is a matter of perspective only; it is something that individuals and communities construct primarily through language.”

 In simple words, people today will argue, “We cannot know if anything is 100% true or not.  What is true for you may not be true to me and that’s ok.  With no truth, every word we say is really only opinion and should not be stated as fact.” 

I modeled the following argument  to the girls. A “no truth” person argues, “There is no absolute truth.”  Another person asks, “Really? Is that true?”  The “no truth“ person says, “Absolutely.”  My nine-year-old started laughing.  She understands the contradiction of the “no truth” statements.   She understands Aristotle’s  law of non-contradiction, “opposite assertions cannot be true at the same time” (Metaph IV 6 1011b13–20)*2,  without knowing the brainy term.  In other words, a statement cannot be both true and false at the same time.  The “no truth” person breaks the philosophy law of non-contradiction.
Do you stand for truth? Why, or why not?
Sources:

*1) Douglas Groothuis, “Facing the Challenge of Postmodernism” in Francis J. Beckwith, William Lane Craig, and J.P. Moreland, To Everyone an Answer: A Case For the Christian Worldview , (Downers Grove, Illinois:IVP Academic, 2004) .

*2) Malpas, J., "Donald Davidson", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2003 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2003/entries/davidson/>.


For Truth Part 2

Linked to:



big enough logo? :)